Sustainable Industrial Waste Management in Nadee: Healthy and Zero-Waste City
Region : Nadee Subdistrict Municipality | Thailand
Goal : Goal 3 | Goal 6 | Goal 9 | Goal 11 | Goal 12 | Goal 14
Author :
22.03.18
- VIEW 2696
- LIKE 0
- COMMENT 0
Provided by Uploader
Your result
%Probability of Successful Localization & Implementation for Your City
Average result
%Average Results (Out of cities who completed the Toolkit for this case)
- View my Toolkit results
- Find Out Regional Average
Move your mouse over the information you want to check.
Tap to see more detailed information.
My score / Average score
-
A. relevance
% / %
-
B. Clarity
% / %
-
C. Sustainability
% / %
My score / Average score
-
Nature
of the project %-
A. Relevance
% / %
-
B. Clarity
% / %
-
C. Sustainability
% / %
-
A. Relevance
-
Stakeholders %
-
A. Project officers of implementation agency
% / %
-
B. Leadership
% / %
-
C. Affected groups/target population
% / %
-
A. Project officers of implementation agency
-
Resources %
-
A. Human resources
% / %
-
B. Financial resources
% / %
-
C. Technology
% / %
-
D. Information
% / %
-
A. Human resources
-
Institutional
Framework %-
A. Legislation
% / %
-
B. Supports
% / %
-
A. Legislation
-
Project
Environment %-
A. Infrastructure
% / %
-
B. Social Environment
% / %
-
C. Political Environment
% / %
-
A. Infrastructure
Results analysis
Strengths
Strengths
Weaknesses
Weaknesses
Analysis & Interpretation of the Results
A best practice is considered to be likely successful if the total score is above ~60%. Under this threshold, there are concerns and points that should be considered before you move forward with the implementation of this project.
A Key dimension is considered to be a strength in the implementation of the selected best practice if its sectional score is above ~60%. Under his threshold, this dimension can act as a serious weakness and undermine the probability of successfully localizing the best practice.
A brief summary of each dimension:
Nature of the project(relevance, clarity, sustainability), Stakeholders(Project officers, leadership, target population, disaffected groups),
Resources(Human and financial resources, technical/informational capacities), Institutional Framework(Existing legislation, mobilizing external
support), Project Environment(Potential infrastructure, social/political environments)
A strong result from the Toolkit will provide rationale and support in your decision to localize your chosen project. On the other hand, a negative result should alert you to reconsider whether the chosen best practice is appropriate for your city.
Analysis & Interpretation of the Results
A best practice is considered to be likely successful if the total score is above ~60%. Under this threshold, there are concerns and points that should be considered before you move forward with the implementation of this project.
A Key dimension is considered to be a strength in the implementation of the selected best practice if its sectional score is above ~60%. Under his threshold, this dimension can act as a serious weakness and undermine the probability of successfully localizing the best practice.
A brief summary of each dimension:
Nature of the project(relevance, clarity, sustainability), Stakeholders(Project officers, leadership, target population, disaffected groups),
Resources(Human and financial resources, technical/informational capacities), Institutional Framework(Existing legislation, mobilizing external
support), Project Environment(Potential infrastructure, social/political environments)
A strong result from the Toolkit will provide rationale and support in your decision to localize your chosen project. On the other hand, a negative result should alert you to reconsider whether the chosen best practice is appropriate for your city.
MOVE your cursor over the region in Asia you want to know more about.
